"TokenConfig": {
^ In an excellent recent essay that also engages extensively with Palsgraf, Professor Adam Slavny has suggested a broadly similar principle (albeit as a proposal in first-order moral philosophy rather than as an interpretation of tort law’s moral commitments). Adam Slavny, Relational Fault and Unforeseeable Victims, 31 Legal Theory 96, 113 (2025). According to this principle, a faulty act incurs (at least presumptively) moral liability to compensate a victim if “the outcome for [that victim] is sufficiently similar to the grounds on which the act that harmed [that victim] is at fault.” Id. To test this principle, suppose a defendant negligently destroys a painting owned by A, which A would otherwise have sold for $5,000 to B, who in turn would have sold it to C for $10,000. A and B both lose out on $5,000, but only A is entitled to recovery (both as a matter of tort doctrine and ordinary moral intuition); B has suffered textbook pure economic loss. The parties are distinguished only by the fact that A’s rights, unlike B’s, are infringed. The case suggests that Slavny’s principle is not quite accurate, whether as an interpretive account of tort doctrine or as a philosophical account that faithfully reflects ordinary moral intuition, unless it tacitly builds in the idea of rights infringement.
。搜狗输入法对此有专业解读
search that I never anticipated.，这一点在手游中也有详细论述
忙碌间隙，抬头看看天——干了30年环卫工作，全国人大代表、山东省东营市湿地城市建设推进中心职工张金海养成了这个习惯。。业内人士推荐官网作为进阶阅读
他在週一表示：「很明確地得知有五位女性希望留在澳洲。」